You guessed it still faffing about and procrastinating and not making good on my new years' resolution of sitting out/participating in lots of courses, but here is my final feint before I delve in: How to assess music courses and tutorials?
AI, we already talked about it, but I use more and more, also for delightful 'graphic art' and giggly text writing, I am a convert & fanboy fo' sho'. but I get to terms with the negative aspects by for instance always heavily editing AI texts to the tune of my voice and thoughts. AI art on the platform I use has to be declared as such.
I asked Bing AI (who reduced my verbose and detailed query to a search string 'dance music production tutorials and courses online quality relevance assessment') and it came up with a surprisingly (?) decent initial list (AI cheated a bit and also included stuff valid for any [online] course). Who has something to add to this list? See my own suggestions after list item 20:
[sorry for the white space, too much garbage html riding along]
I would add these:
21. Reputation/stability of platform, e.g. I paid for courses but they are not online any longer because the website has disappeared.
22 Fun factor: is the course enjoyable, is the instructor engaging?
23. Quality of video, images and audio (some instructors apparently don't know too much about recording commentary and voice-overs etc.), kid you not! Not all screen capture software is equal and video editing can be a bit harder than you think.
24 Quality of streaming and website accessibility
'Course relevance' (item 15) has of course a subjective dimension but it also needs to weigh 'is the course relevant for today's music' (is it on trend etc.) but you could argue any (old) course could be relevant for today's music if you make it so and/or contains transferable/applicable techniques...
updated by @deltadio: 01/23/24 11:46:35AM